vinhomedanphuongz67 のバックアップ(No.2)

• バックアップ一覧
• 差分 を表示
• 現在との差分 を表示
• ソース を表示
• vinhomedanphuongz67 へ行く。
  • 1 (2021-10-15 (金) 15:42:21)
  • 2 (2022-02-24 (木) 03:27:54)

https://bit.ly/3sb2Oic https://bit.ly/353gq6n https://bit.ly/3JPsZkw https://bit.ly/33OQ2ww https://bit.ly/3BY2837 https://bit.ly/3JBF10A https://bit.ly/3HfPKMy https://bit.ly/3LUOSAv https://bit.ly/3LUBZqj https://bit.ly/33I62jE https://bit.ly/35nmTcc https://bit.ly/3IhQ4Md

common in people with deep sexually submissive desires. And I wanted those things long before I ever even knew that there were other people whose sexuality revolved around dominance and submission.

Not all of the D/s activities were appealing to me, by any means; if a man waved one of those horrid bdsm "checklists" at me, the vast majority of them would be of no interest at all. But when it comes to the many things that I do enjoy and desire sexually, they would just be a bunch of random disconnected dots with no pattern or rhyme or reason -- except for the fact that they all relate to my sexual submissiveness. Once that central theme or organizing principle is in place, then all the dots of desire connect into a coherent roadmap to my deep submissive sexuality.

“Conquest”, if that be the appropriate term, works both ways. I am not much vested in the notion of conquest, perhaps because it has for me connotations of a zero-sum transaction in which one wins and the other loses... Any “conquering” to be done happens mostly in the psychology of admiration/desire.

It definitely does not work "both ways" if the main theme of the relationship is that of masculine domination and feminine submission. Nor is it a "zero-sum game" -- since both parties deeply desire the man to conquer the woman, then both of them win when he actually does that. Again, it almost sounds here like you're not into male domination at all, but that's pretty much the theme of Taken In Hand; if you take out the erotic component of male domination, then it's almost more like DD (domestic discipline) instead. So, what aspects of Taken In Hand are you into?

Humbling is much better than humiliating. And even there, only if it is ennobling in some sense, like the admiration we feel for nobility of character or scope of intellect and achievement.

Umm, I'm not sure how that relates? If a man forces me to my knees and makes me kiss his boots, then that is a very dominant act on his part. He is humbling me through his